One intellectual objection that many nonbelievers express, in regard to coming to Christ and the Gospel, is the exclusivity of Christ. They know that Christians believe everybody spends eternity in either Heaven or Hell. They know that Christ-followers believe it's only by the blood of Jesus that we can be forgiven and experience eternal life. They wonder how a loving God can condemn someone to Hell just based on where they're born. How can someone who murders someone in cold blood but repent in old age go to Heaven when someone who doesn't do anything horrible their entire life not go to Heaven? How would you be so arrogant as to say Christianity is right and somebody else is wrong? Beneath all these objections is just the sentiment that someone can't believe in a God who's less compassionate than they are. Even as Christians, these questions can be difficult to grapple with answers that make sense to us, and we feel would make a difference in the way that an unbeliever thinks.
So why the exclusivity of Christ? This is connected to a theological question that we all ask at some point: Why did Jesus have to die on the cross? Why couldn't God the Father just forgive everyone instantly and it's all good? It’s because forgiveness always has a cost. When a wrongdoing or sin occurs, someone must pay the price for that. By God graciously sending his son to die on the cross, Jesus paid the cost for all the sin that you and I will ever commit. Jesus’s sacrifice on the cross was the most compassionate act that anyone has ever, or will ever, do. Isaiah 30:18 says, “Yet the Lord longs to be gracious to you; therefore he will rise up to show you compassion. For the Lord is a God of justice. Blessed are all who wait for him!”
Reflection/Discussion Questions: Have you encountered someone who had an objection to exclusivity of Jesus? How did you respond to them?

Comments